• Home
  • Dining
  • Real Estate
  • Multimedia
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe to Mailing List

The South Portlander

KEEPING THE NEWS LOCAL  Feedburner/RSS

  • Most Popular
  • Most Comments
  • Comment Leaders
Oil Tank Design Finalists Unveiled (2906)
Candidates Look Toward Fall Races (1874)
Sound Barriers Planned for I-295 Neighbors (1636)
District 2 Competition Shaping Up (1513)
SoPo DOG Prez Urges Calm (1268)
Maine Military Museum to Host 2nd McCain Rally (1193)
Attorney May Run in District 1 Race (1166)
School Board Candidates Stake Positions (48)
Oil Tank Design Finalists Unveiled (42)
Labrie Urges Fundraiser for Dog Park (37)
Candidates Look Toward Fall Races (35)
Maine Military Museum to Host 2nd McCain Rally (30)
Counter View Offered on Pet Access to Willard Beach (29)
Sound Barriers Planned for I-295 Neighbors (27)
sopo_westend (53)
mike (48)
Sharky (37)
Kendall Fassett (29)
jay allen (21)

Friday, August 15, 2008

Curbside Recycling Excludes Some Apartments, Condos

The biggest challenge with recycling is getting people to do it.
But that did not seem to be the case Monday night, when some landlords and condo residents came to a City Council workshop to plead with SoPo leaders to let them take part in the newly revamped curbside program, which has a stated goal of increasing participation to lower trash disposal costs.
Although residents from T-Ledge, Jamestown Court and Spring Street apartments previously put their recyclables out by the curb in 14-gallon bins for pickup, they are denied service in the new automated program that introduced 65-gallon barrels on wheels.
City Manager Jim Gailey explained that a 1990 ordinance excludes apartment buildings larger than four units and condominiums with more than eight units from recycling pickup. The condos and apartments that did get service previously, were allowed as special exceptions when they requested it. The new, more costly program is not as generous.
Gailey said that the city will have to pay more to allow apartment buildings and condo complexes to participate. Some of the streets into these developments are “substandard,” and may crack under pressure from heavy trucks.
The city has a five-year, $4.3 million contract with Pine Tree Waste for recycling and rubbish pickup. The contract includes $93,000 for 8,200, 65-gallon recycling containers. The program is taxpayer-funded.
Councilor Linda Boudreau, who chairs ecomaine, and Councilor Tom Blake, a long-time conservationist, urged the city to find a way to accommodate every resident who wants curbside recycling. Blake said that the city does not need to make a huge additional investment, but try to add the residents who want to take part.
But Mayor Jim Soule said he would “fight tooth and nail” any efforts to allow apartment buildings and condo complexes to join the recycling program. Soule said that residents already are having trouble with heating bills and he does not want to put anymore cost burdens on them.
Councilor Jim Hughes said he felt that condo owners already get a break because the developments are allowed to forgo standard lot sizes and build smaller roads, as long as they pick up costs for snow plowing and rubbish removal. Those savings are passed on to residents, who pay less for their homes, he said.
Public Works Director Dana Anderson estimated that buying additional 65-gallon barrels on wheels would cost $55-$60 per container. The cost could go as high as $25,000-$30,000, if 500 were purchased, he said. He projected an additional $55,000-$60,000 for the recycling pickup, bringing the total up to $100,000 a year.
The condo residents and apartment landlords at the meeting said they’re willing to work with the city and roll the bins out to the street. At least one condo development already has the blue bins. One of the landlords said after the meeting that he is willing to help pay the costs.
Boudreau asked Anderson for more specific data on where buildings and complexes are located, and the costs to add them to routes. Anderson said he could have figures in October, especially if he focuses on residences that have made specific requests for recycling pickup.
The Council expects to deliberate further in October.

Posted by Linda on 08/15 at 12:56 PM
Categories: City Council   Energy/Recycling  
Permalink  Email This Entry   Share:    Digg!   
RSS comments feed for this entry

Comments

By Conservatives Don't Conserve on 2008 08 15

Once again the conservatives Soule and Hughes on the COuncil don’t know what it means to conserve...how ironic! Why are those on the right, usually rich white men, always impeding recycling efforts? Are they worried their wealthy friends will somehow lose money? Or do their wealthy supporters just not like the idea of having to touch or sort the garbage. That is what servants are for, right?


By sopo_westend on 2008 08 15

If people want to recycle, they should be encouraged, not discouraged. 
I bet there are dozens or even hundreds of homeowners who have received the new recycling containers but don’t use them (not interested, too lazy, etc).  Give those containers to renters and condo owners who will put them to good use!


By the best change on 2008 08 15

If the owners of the condos and apartment buildings are willing to make concessions… why can’t the city?  It would be less expensive for the owners to toss money at the city and help cover the expenses than to pay for the service to the building.  Taxpayers are taxpayers.  The city is paying for this program with taxpayer dollars and taxpayers are not allowed to participate.  Never should anyone be prevented in efforts to recycle.
Bees, dogs, tattoo parlors, recycling… *sigh


By no more on 2008 08 16

Did Jim Hughes really make this about economics?  How much someone pays for their home determines the eligibility of that person to services in the city that they pay taxes in?  Mr Hughes, surely you are not discriminating based on economics? These apartments and condo sub-divisions in and of themselves are more eco-friendly than Mr. Hughes’ home that he apparently has spent so much more money for.  Less space is used for a denser amount of people, therefore leaving a smaller footprint on the earth, etc.
And Mr Gailey, if recycling services were provided before, doesn’t that mean “big trucks” were already driving through these neighborhoods to pick up the curbside recycling?  Are the trucks now so much bigger that they will crack the roads?  Come on now.


By republicansarealwayswrong on 2008 08 16

Property taxes are built into a person’s rent.  Just because they are not on the deed does not mean they are not paying their share.  They deserve the same services that Jim Hughes and Jim Soule receive.


By MorePolitics on 2008 08 16

The conservatives on the council like to say they are watching out for our money, but then do nothing to help those paying for services they aren’t getting. Why in this liberal town do we have a council run by conservatives like Jim Soule, Jim Hughes, Maxine “you know” Beecher, and Kay Loring? Oh, don’t forget Linda Boudreau, too. Compared to vowels, she is like the “sometimes Y”...sometimes she is conservative based on how the wind is blowing. Can’t we do better?


By andrew  (apr7777@gmail.com) on 2008 10 27

Recycling is extremely important today. And if it costs a little bit more that is fine by me. I live in an <a href="http://houston1apartments.com/seabrookapartments.php">apartment and I would love to be able to recycle. And if it costs more that is ok with me.


Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:


Most recent entries

Maine Mall Owner Hires Bankruptcy Lawyers
History Group Looks Back at the Sardine Industry
VIDEO: City Presents Gift to West End Trails Group
IntelliCare to Close South Portland Office
Maine Mall Owner Makes Property Tax Payment
Council Deadlocks on New Mayor
Tweeter Is Closing Mall-Area Store
LIVE: Council Reviews Tattoos, Museum Move, Park Signs
Feather in the Cap for SoPo’s Backyard Chicken Farmers
Dog Owners’ Group Meets Monday
Gas Prices Drop
Dog Group Plans to Pass Out Flyers
Holiday Crafts Fair Canceled
Two SoPo Tech Firms Win Grants
Oil Tank Artist: ‘All Art Is Political’

Monthly Archives

November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
Complete Archives

Search by Topic

Reader Comments

Matthew Beck said ...

Tom Blake will be an excellent mayor for the City of South Portland during some very challenging times. He is a smart, well-prepared, compassionate member

Posted on 2008 11 20
From 'Council Deadlocks on New Mayor'.
Amy said ...

I want Tom Blake to be my Mayor. How can we vote on this? Do we have to do a

Posted on 2008 11 20
From 'Council Deadlocks on New Mayor'.
Loading...

Latest Video


Click to play

Helpful Links

October Tide Chart
Cinemagic Movie Times
City of South Portland
The South Portlander | lhersey@southportlander.com