• Home
  • Dining
  • Real Estate
  • Multimedia
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe to Mailing List

The South Portlander

KEEPING THE NEWS LOCAL  Feedburner/RSS

  • Most Popular
  • Most Comments
  • Comment Leaders
Oil Tank Design Finalists Unveiled (3392)
Will Voters Determine Beach Access for Dogs? (2660)
Council Deadlocks on New Mayor (2658)
Views on Pet Access at Willard Beach (1997)
Candidates Look Toward Fall Races (1990)
Blake Wins Caucus By 6-1 Vote (1845)
Sound Barriers Planned for I-295 Neighbors (1719)
School Board Candidates Stake Positions (48)
Council Deadlocks on New Mayor (46)
Will Voters Determine Beach Access for Dogs? (42)
Oil Tank Design Finalists Unveiled (42)
Labrie Urges Fundraiser for Dog Park (37)
Candidates Look Toward Fall Races (35)
Blake Wins Caucus By 6-1 Vote (31)
mike (66)
sopo_westend (66)
Sharky (56)
Kendall Fassett (33)
yournamehere (21)

Monday, November 03, 2008

LIVE: Tattoo Regulation Passes First Reading


South Portland’s first-ever code regulating tattoo parlors and body-piercing establishments took a step toward enactment Monday night over the strenuous objections of Councilor Tom Blake and two other councilors.
“We are treading in an area where we don’t belong,” said Blake. “It’s not up to us to regulate this.”
Blake listed his objections to the proposed regulations: the state already regulates these businesses; by choosing to regulate tattoo parlors at the city level, but not other businesses, the city is singling out tattoo parlors and treating them unfairly; the city doesn’t have the people, knowledge or time to spend regulating them locally.
“Why are we picking on this profession?” he asked. “We don’t require background checks on other businesses.”

The Council has been working on a proposed set of regulations since a tattoo and piercing business tried to open in South Portland last spring. After the Council heard a proposal for a temporary ban on tattoo parlors, the businessman planning to open a shop chose a location in Standish instead.
On Monday night, the Council heard the formal regulations, which establish health and safety rules, a criminal background check for operators and regular inspections. The first reading passed 4-3, after objections by Blake, who was supported by Councilors Kay Loring and Jim Hughes.
However, Mayor Jim Soule spoke strongly in favor of the ordinance, along with Councilor Maxine Beecher. Both talked about potential health risks in a business where “bodily fluids are exchanged.”
“I believe it’s the duty of the City Council to protect the health of the citizens,” Soule said.

Councilor Claude Morgan—who voted to support the regulations—noted to Soule and Beecher that no bodily fluids are exchanged when tattoos are applied. (Morgan also has acknowledged that he has a tattoo, though he has declined to say what it is.)
Now that the proposal has passed a first reading—with Soule, Morgan, Beecher and Linda Boudreau supporting it—the proposal requires a final reading and positive vote at the next Council meeting in two weeks before being enacted into law. 

Posted by Scott Hersey on 11/03 at 08:49 PM
Categories: City Council   Tattoo Parlors  
Permalink  Email This Entry   Share:    Digg!   
RSS comments feed for this entry

Comments

By sopo_westend on 2008 11 03

What on earth are they talking about?  “Exchanged” implies that fluids are transferred from one person to another.  Ummm… do these folks understand how tattooing works?  It’s not a blood transfusion for heaven’s sake…


By anonymous on 2008 11 04

The comments made by Beecher and Soule show that they have not done even rudimentary homework before casting their vote. They virtually slandered an entire profession with their bizarre comments about exchanging body fluids.  And how about that “progressive” hypocrite Claude Morgan? You would think he might understand the prejudices of a selective criminal background check. Thankfully Claude is leaving.  Unfortunately Soule and Beecher will remain to make more poor decisions.


By What'sUp on 2008 11 04

Another nutty decision by our city leaders. Allowing personal prejudices control the regulations of the city.


By sopo_westend on 2008 11 04

I went to my doctor’s office today and got a flu shot.  Oh no!  Bodily fluids!  PLEASE, SoPo city leaders, step up and regulate doctors’ offices before it’s too late!!!


By Sharky on 2008 11 04

Haven’t our city leaders been paying any attention to the phrase “creative economy?”

Kudos, again, to Tom Blake for having common sense, articulating his objections clearly, and voting against this. Bravo also to Hughes and Loring. The city is wrong on this, and it seems to me they may be opening themselves up to potential legal action by this discriminatory act.

Step into a tattoo shop around Portland. Most are clean, well-lit, sanitary and could be mistaken for art galleries - because they are, of a sort. The owners are artists and business people, interested in making a living doing what they love. They take care to keep themselves and their clients healthy. And, again, they’re already regulated by the state.

Back off, now.


By Sharky on 2008 11 04

In response to the first two comments: yes indeed, there is a transfer of bodily fluids. The tattoo artist punctures the client’s skin with a needle repeatedly and comes into contact with their blood. That’s why all tattoo artists wear rubber gloves nowadays. They also sterilize their tattoo equipment after every use and disinfect their work areas frequently. And then there’s other forms of body modification such as body piercings, and don’t forget the split tongue look. (Yeesh.) Some tools, such as single-use razors and needles, are used once and thrown away.

Here’s a great informative link from a reputable source:
http://www.cdc.gov/Features/BodyArt/


By sopo_westend on 2008 11 04

OK, so bodily fluids are “transferred” from the client’s skin to the artist’s rubber gloves.  Fine.  But “exchange” of bodily fluids is what was being said by certain councilors, and that implies that the fluids are going from one human to another human, and that simply does not happen… unless Mr. Soule and Ms. Beecher were thinking about prison tattoos or something...?






Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below:




Most recent entries

LIVE: Resident Blasts Council
Rep. Eberle Meets With Voters Jan. 10
Spring Applications Surge at SMCC
Longfellow Chorus to Perform
Coastal Home, Office Building Top Real Estate Sales
Baldacci Lauds Crowley’s ‘Survivor’ Instincts
Bob Crowley Day is Tuesday
Weather: Morning Report
A New Year’s Eve Land Donation to the City
Bob Crowley Day Finalized
Wedding Expo Scheduled
Fuel Spill May Have Caused Apartment Fire
Will Voters Determine Beach Access for Dogs?
MAP: Consultant to Review Commercial Properties
Ocean Street Apartment Building Burned

Monthly Archives

January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
Complete Archives

Search by Topic

Reader Comments

Jon G. said ...

Oh Jonathan G., go back to Beach Street and pull the shades. Your idea about the armory is foolish, and the truth is that dogs are owned by many people in

Posted on 2009 01 05
From 'Will Voters Determine Beach Access for Dogs?'.
Vacationers said ...

I spent 10 days in South Portland last summer.  My husband and I rented a house by Willard Beach and it was a fantastic vacation.  In fact, the main

Posted on 2009 01 05
From 'Will Voters Determine Beach Access for Dogs?'.
Loading...
The South Portlander | lhersey@southportlander.com